Sunday, October 16, 2011

A Sonnet: The Boy Who Hates The Game Baseball Is Odd

A Sonnet:         The Boy Who Hates The Game Baseball Is Odd

The boy who hates the game, baseball, is odd,
he stays inside with books on days of yore.
His mind is set on lands where knights have trod,
his brothers scorn these books, “a useless bore.”

The teen, he listens not to Rock and Roll,
he likes the sounds of Ludwig and of Bach.
To them, the masters’ compositions “blow,”
but he can’t stand the crashing of punk rock.

His children name no players on a field,
they do not know an Indy from NASCAR.
They know the tales of Twist and Copperfield,
and they can cook and paint and play guitar.

He loves his family when all's said and done,
but can’t agree that he’s the oddest one.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Where Does Rain Come From?


Where Does Rain Come From?

            My duties as quality engineer for United Technologies included visiting automobile assembly plants in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois for new product launches and problem solving activities when things went wrong.  Dorothy and I had been married for seven years when I went to work at the Holland facility, and partly because we had three kids and Dorothy stayed home instead of holding a job, money was very tight.  Regarding vacation time, we fit day trips into our weekends whenever we could, not being able to finance a whole week off at a time.  So, whenever the company sent me to an assembly plant, I requested the company car, which happened to be a white Ford Taurus station wagon.  I tried my best to get my meetings scheduled on a Friday or a Monday.  On such occasions, I called Dorothy as soon as I knew about the assembly plant issue, and she prepared the kids.  The fact that single business travelers in America sleep in rooms with two double beds meant that there was always enough for my family of five, three kids under the age of seven snuggled in one bed, Dorothy and I snuggled into the other.  They usually played around the pool while I was at the plants, and sometimes we were able to see a couple of sights on the weekend itself.  I don’t recall that there was anything to see around Janesville, Wisconsin, but we once saw the cabin where Abraham Lincoln was born.  When the meetings were in Detroit, my wife’s hometown, we stayed with mom or Dorothy’s sister.

            The key to making the best of a couple of weekend days is to get to the destination as expeditiously as possible.  I came to understand my father’s strategy for vacationing on these trips.  As negative as driving long stretches in a car can be, the alternative was never going anywhere.  The kids typically zonked out in their car seats, and Dorothy likewise spent many of these hours asleep in the passenger seat.  Amanda was often the last to succumb to the sandman.  Instead, she talked.  And talked.  Of my three kids, she was always the most gregarious, partly because she’d had the most practice.  Amanda was able to speak whole sentences before she could walk or had teeth.  Back a few years, in the church nursery, the women used to gather around Amanda in the baby department to hear her say things like, “Grandma took me to McDonald’s, we got French fries.”

            On one of our earlier trips, when Amanda was about five, we were the last ones in the car awake, and she asked me, “Daddy, where does rain come from?”  As a fan of Bill Cosby, I had heard of these kinds of parent-child conversations in which the adult is worn to a frazzle by the incessant “why?” of an inquisitive child.  I thought about the question for a moment, and recalled my mother’s scorn for baby-talk and silly answers to childrens’ questions.  I answered Amanda as best as I could, slowly explaining that rain was one step in a great cycle.  Water evaporates from oceans and lakes, and travels many miles in the form of clouds.  I told her that warm air holds more water than cold because there is more space between the air molecules because warm air has more energy and is more active.  I added something about dust particles, though I wasn’t entirely sure whether or not it could rain without dust.  I said that when the barometer falls, it means the air pressure is going down, and with less energy in the sky, molecules would press together and force some water out.  I said the air could hold only a limited amount of water.  Amanda sat quietly while I was talking.  When I was finished, she said nothing.  I asked her, “Do you understand?”  She said, “Yes, daddy.”  I tested her affirmative by asking, “Explain it back to me, then.”  Amanda confidently answered, “Well, first the water goes up, and then the water comes down.”  What could I say, but “You’re right!”

            Out of all the many anecdotes from the childhood of my kids, this one has proved to be one of the most profound.  There have since been many church sermons in which the subject of the day in some form is “Why, God?”  There have been many times when our friends and family, while relating some negative experience, voices the same questions, “Why, God?”  Even in college, we have repeatedly encountered works of literature, that is, poetry, drama, essays, written by great thinkers who eloquently propound a stylized version of the question, “Why, God?”  Since my conversation with Amanda, I have not been able to form the question, “Why, God?”  At least, if I do, I don’t expect the kind of answer I want, that is, immediate and to my liking.  I know I am the child in the car seat.  I can think of three choices God has for answering my questions.  He can remain silent, he can answer me with a simplified answer which is geared down for a child’s understanding, or he can answer me with complete and accurate details. 

In the first case, I don’t personally feel God is ever silent, though he is not obligated to return an answer in the form I demand.  One woman told me she had prayed, “God, if you don’t want me to get a divorce, make it thunder.”  When no thunder came, she felt justified.  Another had prayed, “God if you want me to marry <John> then make the third pearl fall out of my ring again.”  The wrong pearl fell out and the girl became more confused.  When I was considering marriage to Dorothy, I prayed, “Please tell me that I should marry her or not.”  I heard and felt nothing.

In the second case, I think there are very many simple answers to questions we pose for God, maybe too many.  I think of how many sermons I have heard, explanations from elders and counselors, not to mention opinions of fellow Christians about issues in our lives.  I have grown weary of sentences that begin, “Oh, now I know why God…”  I have no problem accepting that someone has discovered a facet of God’s reasons for events in their lives, but I am no longer comfortable with wrapping God up in a portable package.  When we had been married only a couple of years, Dorothy and I supposed that God wanted me in the machine shop to be a witness to the factory workers, that I should be content with my assignment.  The result was that it became difficult to leave BMC when we had opportunity for professional advancement.  Not only that, it was one of the chief reasons I did not finish my degree earlier.  When we weighed out living in Pennsylvania with Center Manufacturing, we foolishly reasoned, “Maybe God is sending us there to learn German, so we will speak it when we finally get to Germany.”  Fact is, only one person we met spoke German in Williamsport, and his dialect would not have been very recognizable in Munich.

Finally, after over forty-five years of church, I have begun to think that God has provided complete and accurate answers for all our questions.  The problem, though, is not with the one giving the answers, but with the one receiving them.  Consider a common question such as, “Why did God allow my father to die early?”  God does not give a simple answer because the answer is not simple.  In order to understand the reason for death, a person must first understand the nature of death, and also of life.  A person must be able to work with the reasons why God created mankind in the first place, and the nature of mankind’s role on the earth, as a culture as well as individuals.  There can be no complete answer until a person can explain the nature of sin, and whether or not it had anything to do with the death.  For that, the person must know the forms, origins, and characteristics of good and evil, both as theoretical concepts as well as actual manifestations in ordinary lives.  For all of these concepts, and more, a person will spend his lifetime considering the evidence. 

There is no simple sentence that will make everyone feel good, yet I feel peace in the realization that the answers are laid out at my feet, though they extend in their complexities beyond the horizon.  I am invited to pursue my answers, to consult those who have gone before, leaving their thoughts in written form.  I am invited to pray for direction, that God will lead me to understanding.  I am encouraged to listen to what the preachers and scholars have to say.  I’m even not above listening to ordinary opinions.  It all contains bits and pieces that I realize I am expected to piece together.  I like to imagine that, when I leave this world and enter the next, and God asks me what I did with my life, and I tell him what I learned, he will smile with the same smile I wore when Amanda told me where rain comes from.

Friday, October 14, 2011

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas

Book Review:               Hunter Thompson, “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” – Part Two

            Hunter Thompson is a qualified instructor to the movement sometimes narrowly referred to as the “Acid Culture.”  Thompson is a former true-believer who kept his eyes open and meditated on the eventual decline and fall of youthful ideals bred within the peculiar combination of space and time which comprised the sixties California scene.  The reader is light-heartedly taken in by Part One of Fear and Loathing.  It is an outrageous narrative which touches lightly on satire of the American Dream, vaguely presenting the protagonist, Raoul Duke as an educated and skilled professional writer for well known print media.  The reader is largely unprepared for Part Two, in which the author skillfully “eases around the entire cloverleaf at a high rate of speed.”  He transitions from an outrageous action narrative laced with bits of satire into a fully developed requiem for a lost generation.  The supporting references to the broken machinery which generates the reality of American culture are so varied and relevant to time and place, even the most savvy reader will do well to research the seemingly innocuous details of Part Two.

            The backdrop for Part Two is a national convention for district attorneys on illegal drugs.  There are characters, but these are less important than the character types.  The district attorneys’ conference is packed with various officers and officials of law enforcement from across the entire United States.  These are people who should represent the best of American ideals, in person.
 
            Over the course of the convention, however, these emerge as nothing special, just a pack of fairly clueless drones who came to Las Vegas in the spirit of getting away with something for nothing, a getaway paid for by American taxpayers.  The narrative body briefly parades several other individuals across the stage; these are also less important as characters than the concepts they represent.  For example, Chapter Ten relates a sad tale of an unassuming kid who comes to Las Vegas on a whim and, having done nothing wrong whatsoever, is picked up for vagrancy and detained for a week.  By itself, the short account arouses irritation, but Fear and Loathing suggests a wider catalog of human scams and excesses (or at least the table of contents for one); the plight of the truly innocent minded kid blows a mental fuse in the reader and prepares him for the elevated consciousness which the final four chapters provide in lieu of a canned moral.

            When the narrative comes around to the subject of the Catholic Church, the Beatles, and the potential existence of a higher “force” in the universe on page 179 in Chapter Eleven, it is not so much that the author feels disillusioned by the apparent lack of God in the universe as it is that he feels the patent unfairness of the system, not only because the average man is insignificant or left out of the insiders' movements, but because the very representatives of the common man, songwriters and poets, especially the Beatles, sold out to the system in order to get their cut of the material side of the American Dream, the money, as doled out by jaded managers and producers.  A final emphasis on this facet of Thompson’s lament comes on page 191 in Chapter Twelve in a discussion concerning the owner of the very well known casino “Circus-Circus.”  The reader comes away with the definite understanding that the American Dream is real, but it is not a public drinking fountain.  It is a private bar, a place where particular passwords and particular currency is required for entry.

Thompson, Hunter. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.  New York:  Random House, 1998.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Blood Brothers in Oil


Blood and Oil

The first summer in the screw machine shop
after I hired you to be the quality control supervisor
we worked out the plan for statistical process control,
you covering the inspectors
while I managed the department and ran interference
with the production supervisors.

We didn’t break or lunch together,
not officially anyway.
But you know we found our own kind of breaks
out on the concrete floor.
We were like welded parts installed aftermarket in a crappy car,
Commiserating on the oppression.

That time when the dick-head
supervisor from the Single Spindle Department
tried to get you fired,
and I went to bat for you in the front office.
Do you remember what old man Bowen said?
“He went out like a whipped dog, he did.”

The last day we worked together,
you presented me with my micrometer;
you had polished it and put it in a clean case
like it was a gold watch.

The following year, while I was with United Technologies
we could barely make time for lunch.
We choked down some Taco Bell
and talked about old man Bowen
as if it was a decade hence.
It doesn’t matter, as nothing
really changes, not at the core.
I should have hugged you then and declared you my blood brother in oil.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Factory Speech

As a prelude to my more substantial musings on the English language variety I observed while working in a screw machine shop in Grandville, Michigan, I offer a few light tips for working in a factory, including some peculiarities of working for an Englishman on American soil.  Official disclaimer:  The following is the truth, infused with my own brand of humor; I hope no one is offended.  If some is offended I sincerely apologize.

Rules for Factory Speech In Politically Correct Times

1.       Racism in any form is punishable by immediate termination, as horsewhipping is out of fashion.

2.      Sexual harassment is punishable by immediate termination.  And, it’s not up to the employee to decide if he is harassing female employees or not.  Best not to notice that members of the opposite sex are around.  Remember, there is NO difference between men and women in the factory, no matter what you learned in school!


3.      Terms for body parts are not usual language of the supervisor, much less the manager.  Humorous substitutes are accepted instead.  Extra points are awarded for artful witticisms.  For example, instead of calling someone a “dickhead,” the employee hoping to be promoted may instead use “muttonhead.”  Never mind the fact that no one in the United States eats mutton.  Insults taken from “South Park” should not be used.

4.      NEVER refer to your personal sexual activities while at work.


5.      ALWAYS assume the wife of your boss is a shining example of virtue and sex is NEVER discussed.

6.      Swearing is acceptable, but for those who wish to ever be promoted, it is limited to artful variations of those words you hear from your dad while on a fishing trip.  These include shit, damn, ass (my brother points out it’s in the Bible), hell (also in the Bible), fart, and piss.  As George Carlin once put it, “You can say turd, but who would want to?”  Any other swearing is unacceptable and is considered the mark of the recruit.  The savvy supervisor will substitute “warm” and “engaging” humor for crude or offensive references.  If the supervisor can affect a drawl, it usually helps.


7.      Recruits are not allowed to affect the colloquialisms of the owner.  It may be assumed that supervisors will “accidentally” pick up some of the owner’s slang through close association with the owner.  As factory owners rarely, if ever associate with the lower class, those of the unskilled ranks who are caught affecting the accent of the owner will be punished under the assumption that they are making a mockery of their betters.

8.      Here are just a couple of notable terms which are specific to the machining industry:
a.       Tit:       A tiny fleck of metal left from an imprecise lathing operation.
                                                               i.      Correct:  “The parts you are running have a large cut-off tit.”
                                                             ii.      Incorrect:  “You have big tits.”  
b.       Tenth:  A measured distance of 0.0001 inch.  Not to be confused with the laymen’s “tenth,” which is 0.1 inch.  The difference between the two is enough to break a $600 tool!
                                                               i.      Correct:  “The part is undersize by two tenths.
                                                             ii.      Incorrect:  “The part is undersize by two-ten thousandths of an inch.

Handy Reference to English-Lancashire Colloquialisms
Such as it is that the owner of BMC and my former boss is native to Lancashire, England, a few handy references are offered the ambitious supervisor who wishes to “brown-nose” his way to a more secure position.  Remember to draw out the first syllable of any funny words such as balls, bloody, or supercilious:

ENGLISH                                                                    AMERICAN PARAPHRASE
Bloody Hell!                                                                 Damn it all! (times ten)
You’ve made a balls-up of it!                                        You’ve really screwed the pooch!
Just a sniff and, Bob’s your uncle, you’re done.             A slight adjustment...you’re finished
I used to know this chap…                                           I used to know this guy…
Supercilious                                                                  Haughtily arrogant
Wag                                                                             Unacceptable, if obscure racial slur
Yanks                                                                          Bloody Americans, (not really used)
Duck                                                                           Sweetheart
Bloody Twit                                                                 Nincompoop, imbecile
My eyes feel like two pee-holes in the snow.                 I am tired, and my eyes are dry.
Lackadaisical                                                               lazy attitude, without initiative
Eh?                                                                              Pay attention, I’m talking.
Right you go.                                                                I’m done; get out.

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Who Are You?

Who Are You?

            I stand alone in the middle of my grandfather’s land in the northern part of the Lower Peninsula in the State of Michigan.  The nearest town is Kalkaska, located a good ten miles to the south.  There is nothing to see; the only possible attraction for this area is solitude.  I am surprised to suddenly find myself watching as an alien spaceship lands within a short walking distance from where I stand.  Instinctively, I realize I have no idea what they want or how they intend to get it.  I don’t know what is important to them.  I reason that, if questioned, my best defense is to remain silent, but I presume they will find someone else to question if it comes to that.  I reason further, that in that case, silence would gain nothing, but could be taken as an insult.  I decide to make the best of the opportunity to welcome the aliens as friendly visitors and hope it will affect a good result.

           
The spaceship does not look like anything I expected.  It is not particularly aerodynamic.  This should not be a surprise because every child of the 1960s knows the principles of aerodynamics do not work above a marginal level in space, but its lack of symmetry is odd, nonetheless.  No obvious weapons are visible, nor does it seem particularly military in appearance.  The surface of the ship has no cut-out areas or windows.  There are no markings I can take to be national symbols or corporate logos.  The closest man-made construction I can compare it with is a lopsided submarine.

            Shortly, a small opening appears in the underbelly of the ship.  A group of three aliens disembark and approach me.  They do not seem aggressive, nor are they in any particular hurry.  They carry no instruments or weapons, and they do not seem to keep step or observe any military protocol.  As they reach where I am standing, I can see their general form is quite human, though they would be noticeable in a crowd as alien.  Their skin is very smooth, but there are sinewy muscles just below the surface which suggests strength and agility.  Two of the aliens smile slightly, while the third addresses me in English.  With no preliminaries, he asks with a slight bow, “Who are you?”

            I am surprised to hear English from the alien, but is has a calming effect on me.  I was tempted to think they might be tranquilizing my mind in some devious way, but their thoughtful expressions disarm my fear and I relax.  I had expected they would ask questions.  I give the most descriptive short answer I can think of:

            “My name is Brian.  I am a member of the only sentient race which lives on this planet; I am human.  Of all the people on this planet I am slightly larger than average, but in this we are all very similar.  My reasoning abilities are above average, but I am not representative of the great thinkers of my kind.  My actual education falls short of those who lead, especially in my geographical region, but in this we are not all similar.  There are those who are highly trained and are expected to manage organizations and governments.  These people have power and usually have many possessions.  There are also those who are expected to contribute to society in more uniform and specifically productive ways.  I am a good representative example of the second group.”

            “People are divided into two sexes, male and female.  I am male.  Males are distinctly larger and stronger than females, and were once expected to dominate leadership and security roles.  Males and females share many characteristics.  The psychological difference between men and women is the subject for much philosophical thought, debate, and even humor.  Regarding me personally, the most noticeable differences between my female partner and I lie in my general lack of intuitive reasoning.  My partner almost always has ideas and forms conclusions by way of mixing rational conclusions with emotions and intuition developed over years of having experiences and engaging other humans in relationships.  Although no human is completely one-sided, my cognitive reasoning is distinctly impersonal; the degree to which I mix rational thought with emotions is inconsistent, sometimes to the point of becoming a handicap.  It is ironic that I am widely considered to be more stable and reliable than my partner.”

            “Our method of procreation here is to attend personally to our offspring until a set time is complete, after which they go off into the world to each find their own fulfillment.  This is called parenting.  There are several parenting styles, usually divided according to the degree to which parents and their children associate with one another and share their interests during the upbringing.  In this, I am considered to be closely attentive.  My philosophy is based on the proposition that the prime objective of any human generation is to prepare the next generation of people for success.  This preparation is an ongoing process which undergoes several changes, and ultimately ends only upon the death of the seniors.  My partner and I are just now experiencing the beginning of the final phase of parenting.  My youngest child has recently passed the last age requirement for becoming a fully accepted member of our society.  Fortunately for my partner and I, this phase is the longest phase.  For some, this phase is the least interactive between parents and children, but I believe my particular philosophy of parenting will result in a long and mutually satisfying period in which my children live independently, but make frequent visits and attend specially planned events.  At such events, parents and offspring share new ideas and impressions from independent experiences.  These events are called holidays.  Before my own time is complete, I hope to engage in satisfying relationships with the offspring of my children.  In the meantime, I will continue to enrich my own knowledge and experience, partly because I think it will be useful to others, but partly because my personal philosophy includes the view that education, like art, music, and love, constitute their own reason for being.”

            Upon the mention of philosophy, the leader of the aliens thanks me and explains he is a diplomat.  His mission requires his immediate contact with government officials, so he declines my offer of coffee without explaining why he chose to land in Kalkaska.  He records my instructions for finding the local police station.  Before he goes, he introduces me to two of his associates.  They are obviously male and female, but whether or not they are marriage partners is unclear.  The alien leader tells me they are educators and their mission is consistent with a longer visit.  They are familiar with human physiology and have information about coffee.  They are anxious to try it.  On the way back to the house, I politely ask, “What do you know about a man named Jesus?”

Monday, October 10, 2011

Brothers in Blues

Brothers in Blues

We rush to get ready, donning suspenders, starched collars and white gloves.
Everything in place, we pick up our leaded rifles
and hurry to formation, accompanied by marshal music.

We line up as we were taught.
We are boys, playing at being men
in a game we do not fathom.

On a field of living green
we march in our black boots, answering calls
across an open field with pride.

Somewhere in the wide world real men are fighting.
They fall dying for the same cause
we celebrate with ice cream and cake.

On fields of living blood
men run frantically in their black boots,
searching for cover while ducking live fire.

They hit the ground as they were taught,
but no one is playing.  They move together as a unit,
while calls and screams accompany a horrific scene.

Men and boys alike, we have all sworn an oath in common:
As men, when the time comes, to pay with our mortal selves, in life or in death,
but my time never comes.

Am I a worthy brother to these men who paid
with blood and bone and plans for tomorrows,
when those tomorrows are mine to spend at will by whim?